|
In Reply to: Re: Comments on WJC posted by CB on September 22, 2008 at 19:01:03:
Well, besides all that, there are websites I came across, where they are all in the "know" of him/Clinton being that Rhodefellow & all those links & in the end, the guy is pretty much a "monster"...though a handsome one...I mean, while in TF we got Berg's take on Nixon, Carter...I think Ford as well and of course Kennedy...frankly, with all that was possible through or against a president in the past...I mean everything else you come across as allegations on some conspiracy-exposure-websites is possible as well...
As far as the affair with M.L. is concerned, well
in a way I pitied M.L., Hillary & even him for a while...at the bottom line I think I'd prefer a candidate/president who maintains a "decent" sex-life...there are too many problems to be addressed
to be other than singleminded...even if such devoted people may be are rare...some say, you can get your appetite somewhere else, but you eat at home...I'd stretch that ideal further (especially if for some odd reason a "Christian" would want that office [ahem, why???]), that appetite & eating place should be pretty much in accordance.I guess that's asking a bit too much, may be...people take their liberties...king David of old is an example (but also in repentance)
What I can't stomach is people who are pretending, having a sanctimonious front/fassade...I forgot the name of the governor or
senator...family man, who seemed so devout & staunch against the "loose" people, and there he
had the very same amusements....I think in NY it was.
There I prefer the outright "sinners"...who are telling it as it is in their lives.You know where they're really at...even though they're still missing the next step,but in their honesty they're at least a step ahead of the pretenders.
