|
In Reply to: Re: The assumption was based on trust posted by Joseph on December 24, 2006 at 05:01:30:
I was trying to be the opposite of critical, I was trying to express appreciation for David C's post. When I read this in David C.'s post: "What you said here below is a very good point and something that is worth consideration. I’ll give it some thought, you may be right. Thanks"
I thought that was very reasonable and I was trying to be supportive of the discussion between BR and David C.
With Christmas visits and such I haven't had much opportunity to come to terms with other coordinators from the site about this apparent tempest in a teapot. From my point of view so far all I can see is that WC helped Billie put a website to promote her book, Billie announced it here, and then Billie Reposter put the link up NDN, George expressed some skepticism about it, and things took off from there. I do wish George would have checked with one of us here first about the Billie Chainey website in BR's post, most of this probably wouldn't have happened.
