|
In Reply to: Re: Jim LaMattery - unanswered questions posted by Passing By on April 09, 2005 at 16:09:54:
I haven't heard about a book deal in the works. I guess I din't exactly make myself clear, I only know that Jim has talked about how he wrote a fictional book about a cult & he said on NDN that he wants to write more. Maybe I'm concerned over nothing but when I thot of the O.J. Simpson jurors all writing books I thot it'd be a good idea to ask Jim for an assurance that he wouldn't do that. I can see he apparently doesn't want to give an answer which is his business but it just doesn't enjender trust.
What's all this business about 'don't ask public questions but only e-mail him' BTW that Perry says below & others have said too? If it's only a question that affects me, fine I'll e-mail him but when it's an issue that affects all of us whatt's wrong with asking publicly? If a question affects 100 people why can only one person know the answer by e-mail?
Like it or not Jim is a leader in this fight agaisnt the family & being a leaders not a bad thing since we need someone with guts to stand up & get things happening. But why can't we ask for simple answers & accountability? I'm not talking about stupid questions like is there really an FBI investigtion. We all know there is one. I'm talking about legitmiate questions that affect all of us.
