|
In Reply to: Can "conservative" Family members save the Family? posted by Donny on December 07, 2002 at 11:56:10:
This is MG's post from below that inspired my rant. Read this to see how Zerby to this day continues to railroad her program through, ignoring saner, more realistic SGA under-leaders. Instead of listening and effecting change she says, "All of these options are impossible."
Want change in the Family? Have hope things will change for the better? ONE year ago your top old fart FGA leadershit said, "All of these options are impossible."
MG wrote:
Zerby continues to preach the same thing, as to how TF's sex doctrines make them unique and thankfully apart from mainstream Christianity. This is an excerpt from "Conviction vs Compromise", a GN series published for TF just one year ago:
"57. I'm very concerned about the conservative, churchy, religious element in our CM Family, wondering what in the world happened to many of you! Where's that dedication you once had to the Words of David, when you were even willing to get out the most radical Letters and posters on the streets by the millions? Now any little mention of sexual freedom or sharing or anything that might stumble someone is hooted down as unreasonable, unwise, unnecessary, and a lack of discretion!
58. What in the world do you want? Do you want all the unique doctrines of the Family to be forgotten, or to be just for your private personal enjoyment, or even to be relegated to the shelves in our older Volumes as a part of our ““history”” which we'd just as soon forget? I'm sorry, but all of those options are impossible!"
