|
In Reply to: Re: ..it really makes me mad... posted by Farmer on July 15, 2009 at 11:35:19:
...e.g. I had a beautiful single female teenager (then 15 ???)in "my" tiny dormitory/room (single again) in Delhi & by "TF-law" could have had an "adventure" with her...It saddened me even then, that she was forced into sex by some leader of a fringe group then in Delhi/India...I discussed/mentioned that before here on the board...but I was hammered into from the very beginning, when I joined, if the girl gets pregnant you oughta marry her...plus I had many other "limitations", coming from a broken relationship, with some little hopes, that something could still be rescued etc...plus I never thought about a relationship, sexual contact with someone that young...call that left over consciousness...Anyway, I hope dear English J. is doing well these days
To add one thing more, I think abuse of minors even contradicted TF-ideology...sexual contact/intercourse was propagated as the enjoyable means to have more children/members...arguing that it could start even possible as early as sexual maturity.
But that contradicts totally the avenues they opened up for the pedophiles...it was just for self gratification and Berg claiming it did him good as a kid...we all had that discussion of course...I am just saying, they were inconsistent without realising it...oh that is one constant in TF
