|
In Reply to: Re: How much of this do we want to allow on our boards? posted by Coordinator on March 04, 2009 at 12:27:39:
Thanks for the very wellrounded presentation of the case/problem.It's probably one thing to target special IP-numbers to avoid the "devoid"
(family-lingo??)...but that can be overcome easilyon their part, if dedicated.I am not so sure, how much "they" seem to be bent on posting here...Ready Freddy was apparently willing to stick around longer...to do what??...frankly I didn't get his intentions, except getting some attention...nothing too substantial.
But ...what if..(another historic/laden term : ( ) some "better material"/opponents...dialogue-seekers appeared?Would we have the time to answer them extensively?
Except for some standard-replies?...I scarcely would take my time, if at all, to wade through their material, to prove some point to a poster.I would just have to go by memory...
One of my very first thoughts...sorry, this is so unorganised...it's late...was, that it'd take somebody's extra time, to screen through their posts...I must commend you, how soon you target nowadays (or always have??...forgot) the potential "troublemakers"....it's work, to pay attention.
Another thing would be necessary...in my view...& I am not sure, if you'd be willing to go to that extent is, to have the other boards free of such
"people" & have them stick to one board...rename it or create a new one...either soap-box would be extended (becoming a "sand-box" in a double-meaning...or poison-cupboard...sounds awful, I know, but that's the way I feel about it) or perhaps journeys...whatever.
I wasn't aware, that such policies bore good fruit at NDN...at movingon they let pro TF SGAs also have their say, usually they left after some "prime-time" of posting.Personally I don't see much danger to it yet...except may be frustration here & there...it could be an avenue though, to help some more to come to terms with the backaches/burdens/heartdiseases, which come with TF
