|
In Reply to: Re: messianic etiquette posted by BC on September 25, 2008 at 14:37:55:
ok, I am actually now with you ; ) ...if we reduce it all to the original meaning of being anointed... & true, many can be anointed...although it would lead here and there to a possibility of mix up, as I outlined...if someone coins a term, like done as you quoted, I guess it's always best to use the word in the context/meaning the "author" of that
term wants it to have...
Thanks for the updating on Palin...I was "alarmed"
about her closeness to pentecostal churches just recently...after it was pointed out the seeming contradictions between her highly religious stance on sex in general & the "singledom"-pregnancy of her oldest (?) teenage-daughter...the new "politeness" in politics has it
that that is now no theme /subject in the election-campaign...I guess they'll find lots of other interesting stuff...& your link may just be
part of it...may be it appeals to some voting Christian, this spiritual warfare stuff...to me it's appalling
If you even watched a youtube video about Todd Bentley, I mean he spouts off all kinds of things, but the Bible...& there is the parallel to Berg,
I still remember the day, where some "new wine" of Berg stated, that we can read the Bible, but really don't need to, as we have his letters & there is no time to read so much Bible & as he had done that...blah, blah...hello Mr.Berg...actually we got more time than you - falsely predicted
