The Family Children of God by insidersChildren of God Family International
Home Chat Boards Articles COG History COG Publications People Resources Search site map
exFamily.org > chatboards > genX > archives > post #30536

Re: "through" a verb? (confused...)

Posted by Farmer on February 01, 2008 at 02:06:47

In Reply to: Re: "through" a verb? (confused...) posted by Perry on January 29, 2008 at 18:19:40:

Alright, thanks for the answer...first of, it happens to be sheer coincidence, that I chose to write "aren't you glad..."...it just popped up in my mind.I shouldn't write everything which pops up there (could be from stupid , over boring to fairly discriminating),obviously...but I "liked it"...you see, I am often fairly silly and ironic in German, since people think they are so intelligent here, so serious in their silly ambitions and it seems to me, that often they aren't interested in the real "gems of wisdom" anyway...it was a rudimental, rhetoric, ironic question, cause obviously you wouldn't want a Godhead to have an eye over you, as it/he doesn't exist for you, that "eying" is not there...another meaning in my mind was, that TF was keeping constantly another eye on us and they thought it to be for our well being and such phrase could be somehow from Zerby & Co...you & I wouldn't like that oversight nowadays (agreement!!!! ; ) )

I had a short glance at your website (and missed that subtitle) and marvelled how neately it was done.Birds have my interest too, my achievements in photography should be behind yours, so that's where I focussed in on.


Of course there had also to be some "hot/smart" links...from what I remember.
That I don't like Dawkins, I must not be too specific about...I don't even like his "silly hairdo"...but honestly: the man studied some Biology and now thinks he has had the big atheist heureka/"illumination" and is now on a mission.Strange, people smarter than him, as I think mathematicians and physicists (even chemists) to be, happen to still believe in God...granted, there are physicists and mathematicians which are agnostics and atheists, but the point is: faith can be coupled with smartness and Dawkins is just a bit too noisy for my liking.Would be better, if he'd take some more courses in something bit more complicated than biology (cause the origin of life he can't explain anyway)...may be he would reach the end of being able to explain things and stop being that cocky, starting to marvel a bit more.

Glad, you responded to Mig and that you wouldn't forbid the spreading of the Bible...right, it didn't work yet anyway (Communist Russia etc.), no use, as far as I believe.Believe it or not, I am all for people dissecting theologically/scientifically the Bible, the smart people learn from it, the "stupid" get lost in all the details, with all the pieces, unable to put together the big puzzle.Apparently the book is really not for everyone to understand (Not that I understand everything of it...it seems endless the contents...but the situation is better now than ever before in my life, so that I wonder, how could I have fallen prey to the stupid explanations of TF...one answer is: false teachers...another: my own weaknesses)