|
In Reply to: Re: A one-cent suggestion posted by long time out on September 20, 2007 at 00:30:23:
I agree with some of your points coordinator. The only thing I am hesitant to do is offer even more pages that will come up when specific names are googled.
If I understand correctly, there is really no way to GUARANTEE the protection of any certain someone. Even if you do "accept" their apology.
I think a prospective employer could really care less just how sorry or changed someone is when they have a history in TF. Do you really think they are going to pour through those links? Or the more juicy ones from years ago that are so harmful.
And the point about using "bible" names, that will just link right to their legal names.
My question to coodinator is: So what if they used FCF. I don't think it was to give TF legitmacy. I think it was more like survival. If donors could "tithe" through FCF, they were much more willing to give, being able to write it off. Would you rather them of been in TF in a 3rd world country and not used FCF? It was a way to feed their families. Why pin point that group? All donations given to TF are equal, whether funnelled through FCF of not. Some little poor nobody on the feild is not to blame. It is the founder or coordinater of the bogus foundation.
