|
In Reply to: Thanks, Perry posted by Researcher on December 11, 2005 at 15:46:44:
Where did Monger imply that duplication was a bad thing? I didn't get that from his posts- unless I missed one. Think about it, if all of the exer sites were duplicated in every nation on the globe, in every language, then I believe that the exposure of TFI would happen so much more rapidly. Or is that not the point?
Every site does have a purpose, and for me every word is important and part of history in the making. Each site is unique, albeit duplication is evident in all of the information portions of these sites. What shouldn't be duplicated is the initial work it takes to put information about TFI online in the first place. This is why FPAC links to information that is already accessable- no need to reinvent the wheel.
