|
In Reply to: To Jim (Et Alii) posted by WC (gen coord) on December 11, 2005 at 09:45:31:
Your suggestion of me taking "time out" is a criticism that would be better aimed at those who have posted the questions/comments that they have asked me. I have had a spot of time in the last few days to give to those who have posted sincere, and sometimes, not so sincere questions. I don't visit this board frequently, I don't use it as a theraputic support, and I am not trying to win support from its members.
I suppose that if you want to impose a temporary ban on this discussion, such as a "time out," then you request it of all of those posters that have continued to ask questions and/or post statements regarding me, my "agenda," their interpretations of my "motives," etc. If everyone is following the rules of this board, why would you want to stop the flow? If it makes you feel uncomfortable, please step aside and let others speak freely.
I have never protested about any of the questions posed to me on this board. I have protested issues of fair play. I feel that many posters have actually broken the rules regarding name-calling, etc., and you have sat by without correcting them. Maybe your time would be better spent monitoring the context and letting the content move freely until you feel the content has abridged the rules of this board.
