|
In Reply to: To Jim: From what I am reading posted by Jo on December 08, 2005 at 17:17:26:
Here's where its tricky for me- when I don't agree with someone, the claim is that I'm not listening. Not listening and not agreeing are surely not the same. My decision about posting or not posting Peter's communications were not an attempt to confuse anyone. That may be yours, or another's perspective, or not. But when one respectfully asks me "why not post them" they get the answer from me. As you know, you wrote me about the letters and made some suggestions- one of which I felt a very good one.
When you talk about the majority of perspectives about me (ie; trust, listening, etc.)you are referring to only those who have posted comments in this thread. It would be important to know who has said these things as the anonymity of the posts do not lend me to trust who is making them-particularily on a public board. There is a silent majority of non-posters who read but don't respond to these posts. They may never be heard from, so I can't base my judgements of what I think the general perspective on me is, on the few that post. Thanks.
