|
In Reply to: Re: Question to JLM posted by QS on December 08, 2005 at 10:38:39:
QS-
My explaination of whether or not I will post the Peter communications was extremely detailed, not vague, and illustrative of the complexities of actually posting them. My request to know who it is that I am actually answering has more to do with the content of the communications. Some of these communications could be used to prove perjury on the part of Peter and Maria in a future lawsuit, so it is important to handle them carefully, and know who I'm talking to.
I do my own bidding, I need no one else to do it for me. I don't feel anyone here on these posts are garbage, that is precisely why I refused to ever name call them. I have asked for help in the investigations.
I have not tried to buy anyone's rights to their story. I have my own story to tell. I have not missed anyone's posts in the past.
I could never "be one of us." This is why I left TFI in the first place. I can however "be me."
What have I done to you that was "unmerciful?" If I haven't offended you, as you state in this post, then how does it follow that I've been "unmerciful" to you?
I will not stop asking questions that I feel are pertinent to this story of TFI and the impact on my children's and my life, not until I get a resolution. But please understand, I have been answering what I believe to be sincere and important posts on this board for the last few days. I did not start this thread, and I don't need to finish it. But I must respond to the satisfaction of myself, because it is I that I must answer to at the end of the day.
If the sunset is a better place for you to be, instead of answering this post, then I understand.
