|
In Reply to: Did Anybody Here Read the Piece in Harper's Magazine posted by Newsbot on September 02, 2005 at 16:05:10:
The tragedy of : A life (Ricky's)formed by notions of naivete, blind obedience, faith in sex as a pure and harmless activity, led by a bitter and self-absorbed dictator, surrounded by silly flunkies, who helped him to get all the silly sex he desired.
Ricky, as a child, sounds normal, wanting to play with his cars. Sara and every adult sound sick, deceived, blind, and obsessively judgemental and paranoid in a retarded and delusional fashion--taping Ricky's scissors for safety and previewing his movies, while letting him partake in and watch x-rated orgies, see lesbian hardcore sex, screaming orgasms, etc; all things that no doubt formed primal and lasting impressions on his young mind.
The intellectuals and thoughtful, educational folks who read Harpers, don't need excessive analysis to see the harm of a cult, and the foolishness of a silly belief in the harmlessness of sex, or even to waste time in defining cults, new religious movements or whatever.
If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is, no doubt, a duck.
The best evidence against the cult is their own faith in sex and the harm they do to children--all to be found in their own writings and even personal communications. The quacking can't be hid.
Although, the leaders seem to be able to hide incessantly. Why?
The
