|
In Reply to: Re: jimmy boy posted by susie on August 26, 2005 at 00:58:30:
I thought your post about Chancellor was great. I am glad I am not so close to the poison ivy forest that I can't see the rash and so I get some sort of polished view of the new improved (NOT) Family.
It was abusive before molestation started, and Maria never recanted on the child sexual abuse but made it clear the changes were about expediency for security of the family's sake.
The control is still there.
That is the way I see it. Personally, I can't stand Chancellor from what I have heard from him and read about him. I don't think anyone regardless of what stature they may have at any given board has the right to put out a shingle as absolute balance and/or official cult ex-member expert.
I don't know why it is, but it seems as ex-mems that if someone doesn't like another person's view they seem to have to correct others for theirs. Besides, the family was a destructive cult before it ever even started the child molestation/incest phase.
Maria still channels "Jesus" and "Dad" and still uses the droning repetitious letters, even more repetitious than Berg was, to indoctrinate people in LJR and any other new nonsense.
Anyhow, you have my applause for your comments. ;)
