|
In Reply to: Re: jimmy boy posted by susie on August 26, 2005 at 00:58:30:
I've previously read the things you suggested. I do not necessarily agree with Chancellor's point of view, research methodolgies, and so forth, but I see nothing warranting some of the comments here. Also, I disagree with the notion that he has "[refused] to include ex members evidence in his appraisal of the Family" ... his statements often directly contradict this claim, though he does seem to have minimized such evidence to a certain degree.
