|
In Reply to: Re: One racist angel posted by susie on April 01, 2005 at 23:39:27:
Sorry, how would you as an "unbeliever" decide, what an angel is?...or simply by deduction:
There are no angels, so the man was not an angel.
On the other hand, what bothers me with atheistic
posters is this of course, for sure, most certainly kind of tenor...we should be more aware of how little we know compared to the allcompassing knowledge...Since there are scientists interested in the various aspects of angels, what is your stance about it?
Just to be sure to avoid misunderstandings: I
don't think Berg met an angel, but somebody spouting off...my interpretation, simply by how
Berg in general behaved, I doubt, he got that much honour as he wanted...but then, I am less & less interested in him, knowing him by the bad fruits,... I am more interested in men & woman with very good fruits.
