|
In Reply to: Re: IRS Investigation posted by Jim LaMattery on March 24, 2005 at 22:12:56:
Hi Jim:
I am curious why individuals should talk to you about immunity? Are you advocating or brokering immunity for any specific individuals at this time? We are talking about a criminal organization that abused children as a policy and there are hundreds if not thousands of abuse offences. Are you speaking for the IRS or the FBI?
I don't see that immunity should be granted to serial sexual predators of children. For example, adults who "set up" or "scheduled" sexual encounters between adults and children are counted as serious criminals in most democratic states and are usually classed as pedophiles or child pimps. There are individuals in our society that are doing upwards of life in prison for such actions. Why should offenders in the family be treated otherwise?. In a sense the family doctrines regarding child sex subjected minors to a form of sexual slavery.
My questions have nothing to do with you personally. I support your efforts to bring the family to justice. They are a response to the serious nature of your post and I would really appreciate some further clarity on this issue.
Sincerely
Rocky
