|
In Reply to: The point posted by Passing By on September 04, 2004 at 10:23:59:
I simply did not want to see the rumor continue on (and that's what it was) that SA had molested a child, there was no evidence of that in any of the documents and in fact, it was discovered to be a fabrication of someone trying to discredit Sam. This has nothing to do with being on one bandwagon or another, or anyone owning any story, but keeping the facts straight. I may not agree that Sam should use other SG's story, but that does not give me a license to repeat a very serious rumor. It's called being objective. That's the only point I was trying to make and to keep the rumor from continuing. Feel free to carry on with your other points.
