In Reply to: Re: This one sentence caught my interest! posted by Acheick on July 09, 2004 at 16:03:37:
I came across a very long 'defense of the Fam' publication booklet written around the time of the British Court Case. I was doing some 2x4 wall construction (about a year ago) for a former Fam friend and I needed something to scribble some figuring on. Out back in a pile of boxes and books was this nice big pub with a big blank back page. "Oh good!" I thought. But when I turned it over, I saw it was the Fam's pr tool to help the members 'refute the lies of the devil.' It droned on and on and on about the Fam's good religious works, and on and on and on about religious persecution, never once touching on the real reason for the Fam's worldwide persecution - the subject of incest. Having been informed, thanks to the exmember boards, I was able to clearly see what a BIG BUNCH OF HOOHEY it was. For the uninformed and uneducated Fam members who haven't really realized what was going on at the top (BERG: "I never touched my daughters!" Of course we don't believe in incest!"), well... it can be highly deceiving, keeping members stuck in the log jam of cult logisitics until forever, imo, not to mention how the uninformed and deceived culter's witness can affect the unsuspecting public.
My former friend 'rescued the pub' after I had a most wonderful, merry, merry time messing up the back page - hee hee hee.