|
In Reply to: Re: Avoid redefining betray as mere "disagreement" posted by Joseph on February 06, 2004 at 11:37:41:
"It's easy to just sluff off the points I make as side issues, and the points you make as the important issues. But, I don't have to go along with that, if I don't want to, as long as we are engaging in a discussion."
No, you don't have to go along with that, but I am surprised that you do NOT see Anneke's betrayal as the main issue on the table here. I actually wonder what is your motive in arguing? You're not the person being discussed in all this. You say you're not Anneke's defender or spokesperson, yet here you are speaking and she's not.