|
In Reply to: "Legally & technically" correct posted by Joseph (reposted) on February 05, 2004 at 17:26:25:
For the record, what she said, directly and indirectly led up to a series of damaging events. There is so much I am not at liberty to tell, and it's frstratng, because I still want you to know it wasn't jst a matter of words on a bulletin board. It's tricky, but I will do my best.
She emboldened Grant to directly threaten certain people, who ended up having to make choices they didn't want to.
She directly and indirectly influenced events that cost us many man hours. Just how many and about what, I can't get into, I'm afraid.
She directly and indirectly contributed to a major rift in the exer community, which was setback for certain projects. Can't say more than that, I'm afraid.
She added to the sense of distrust and betrayal exers already suffer from.
She added to the fear and initimidation many exers already felt. She made people believe it was too dangerous to have free speech, the topic of your post.
That's about all I am at liberty to say.
