|
In Reply to: Re: It's a judgement call posted by WC (gen. coord) on August 30, 2003 at 04:43:08:
I'll try to be brief, because I'm starting to wake the trolls.
You guys are providing a service here. I use the service from time to time. I feel that when I use the service, I am treated differently than others. I've reported my feelings to you, and you have responded in a manner that suggests that I'm just making it all up.
It happened in the discussion regarding people who associate with Family leaders being "party and parcel" to abuse, where I gave an example of how dangerous it is to make those accusations, and was deleted. When messages regarding me and my family, suggesting we were somehow pro-abuse were allowed to stay.
It happened in the discussion about copyright infringement issues where everyone who cared to give an opinion on the subject was allowed to. But, when I did, I was asked to not discuss copyright infringement on this board anymore.
It happened just now, when Sam Ajemian brought up the subject regarding the posting of my private email on this board, including my name, and the names of others involved. That was allowed to stand, but my reply to it was the subject of a consideration to delete.
In a message directly below this one, someone referred to me as "full of hate" and "insanity", because I dared to call my opinion in this matter to your attention. Nobody but me seemed to even notice that message.
So here we go again. Joseph can't defend himself when he is equated with child abusers, Joseph can't discuss copyright infringement issues, Joseph can't respond to Sam Ajemian when he brings up an issue and totally misrepresents it. But, it's okay to suggest that Joseph is hateful and insane. And, you agree that I may be paranoid. Do I have that all correct?
