|
In Reply to: Re: A lesson for all. posted by Acheick on February 05, 2003 at 07:10:40:
Having been in TF gives an edge at knowing that there is more to the story than what we are being told.
If a letter with serious allegations, which inludes names, is received, why did the original writer write it in the first place? What did the writer have to gain by passing on that type of information, also known as gossip? At the very least, the original writer should write a letter of apology to the people whose names were in that letter.
At the time when the infamous letter was posted, a more public discussion was taking place about the behavior of some prominent people in the Washignton DC area, how drugs, alcohol and sexual Family traditions were damaging them. It was an insider's exposure that the letter silenced.
Fact? The allegations the original writer presented in that letter were found to be a fabrication.
Fiction? It seems that there is more to the story than what is being told.
