|
In Reply to: Re: archi... posted by ray on December 10, 2002 at 18:59:48:
ok, this is my last entry in this thread. i reiterate my point since you reiterate yours. again you say you did not 'know'...for any of us to say we did not 'know' (wahtever) we can only say that because we were in a state of denial because there was tons of evidence, so there is no point of saying i did not know much or the other person knew more. when you are in denial, it can be right in front of your eyes and you do not see it. it is not there for you, because you don't want to or are not able or cannot see it in the situation your mind is in at the moment.
i hope this makes it clear.
