|
In Reply to: Re: where? posted by Joseph on July 27, 2002 at 15:47:12:
"For me, the current conversation about people who have helped out SGA's screams out "THEY AREN'T LIKE ME, SO THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS HELPING PEOPLE"."
Nobody said they are not allowed to help SGA's. You are getting over dramatic and over simplifying it. I never expected that coming from you. This is not about stopping people who are different from me from helping SGA's. I explained that it was about giving the right kind of help, and wishing that the right kind of help were available. People myself included have acknowleged that the 3 people you mentioned are in fact doing something and it's OK for now until something better comes along.
"Perhaps you get something different out of it, but that's what I hear."
Strange, but I really do get something different.
"I really have no idea why Bob is banned. I just bring his name up because I know he is banned, and if I were banned, I'd be in his company. I've actually had it explained to me from people on both sides, and it gets so cryptic that I can't really follow it."
That's double talk because you said "If you really get tired of me causing you guys to think and back up your positions, just tell WC to put me in the doghouse with Bob."
You are manipulating the conversation into something else all the time. Now it's about Bob and you not being able to stay around because you speak your mind. I would hope the coordinators of this board aren't as thin skinned as you make them out to be. I would hope they have more integrity than to make everything personal and ban people just because they can't hold their end of a conversation. I like when you speak your mind and I speak mine. You are really pressing buttons trying to insinuate a lot of things about the coordinators. Why such an agenda?
