JW Teen Forced to Have Blood Transfusions

Here's an interesting law suit thingy going on in Canada. From what I understand, the Father of this JW girl has supported the Canadian government's decision to force the girl to have blood transfusions. The Mother and siblings are saying that she NOT have the transfusions. The Father is being shunned because he wants the girl to have the transfusions. Here's the latest I've heard about this case going on:

Apr. 10, 07:39 EDT
Teen must receive transfusions, judge rules

Jehovah's Witness wants to end life-saving cancer treatment

CALGARY (CP) - A leukemia-stricken teen is upset that a second court is forcing her to continue blood transfusions even though it's against her firm beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness, her lawyer said today.

"She'll have to think what her next options are," lawyer David Gnam told reporters outside court, adding that another appeal will be considered.

The girl lost her first appeal Wednesday when Justice Adele Kent of Court of Queen's Bench ruled that the state-imposed blood transfusions are essential treatment for the 16-year-old girl in her two-month battle against leukemia.

"Balancing all the factors, it is in (the girl's) best interest to have medical treatment proposed by the hospital," said Kent, who denied the girl's appeal of a lower-court ruling forcing the blood transfusions.

In mid-February, provincial court Judge Karen Jordan gave the Alberta government temporary custody of the girl and and ordered her to undergo blood transfusions as part of her treatment.

The girl, who cannot be named because she is a temporary ward of the province, is a Jehovah's Witness. Believers say the Bible prohibits accepting any blood products and those who agree to transfusions won't go to paradise after they die.

The girl has been forced - sometimes by being restrained and sedated - to have 14 transfusions and is scheduled for 16 more. After the transfusions combined with intense chemotherapy, her leukemia is now in remission.

The girl's father has consented to the blood transfusions, while his wife and two daughters support the teen's wishes.

"It's been tearing myself and my family apart," the 51-year-old man said outside court.

"But there's only one happy ending and that's if my daughter survives."

Even though Kent deemed the girl to be a mature minor, the judge also pointed out that the teen has not looked "death in the face," because she's been told by fellow Witnesses that the blood transfusions are not essential to save her life.

"Because of incorrect information and the behaviour of some around her she now believes that she will not die if she does not have transfusions," she said.

Her doctors at Alberta Children's Hospital say she has a 40-50 per cent chance of survival with the treatment but will die if she doesn't get blood products. They point out it's the best available treatment - standard North American protocol for acute myeloid leukemia.

In an affidavit, the girl's mother said her daughter's forced treatment bears a "chilling" resemblance to the way Nazis mistreated Jews.

Kent discarded that argument.

"If (the girl's mother) truly believes what she says, then it is a very strong indication that she has no perspective on her child's current medical situation," the judge said. "She cannot make decisions for her."

The judge said she found it "troubling" that the mother tampered with the IV line that carried blood to her daughter.

The girl said she wants to go to California, where she can get "peaceful" alternative treatment that doesn't include blood products. But the judge pointed out the same treatment is available in Alberta.

Child welfare legislation in most other provinces covers children under 16 years of age, but in Alberta it's 18. Some provinces such as Ontario allow some teenagers to choose their own medical treatment, as long as they are deemed mature minors who comprehend the treatment and its consequences.

The Alberta government maintains that the mandate of its director of child welfare is to protect children under 18 when parents are unwilling or unable to do so.

The judge agreed, saying the Alberta Child Welfare Act supersedes the common law of a mature minor because children sometimes need to have their lives protected.