|
The Children of God
by Deborah (Linda Berg) Davis with Bill Davis, 1984
On coming out of the Children of God, I, like all ex-cult members, was
face to face with the question of survival. Since coming into a new
Reality, I have thought about survival, and specifically, what is the
sustaining factor that keeps people from breaking under duress? What
enables people to withstand torture or imprisonment or even the daily
pressures of life?
We don't ordinarily regard alcoholism, depression, or drug dependency
as a form of breaking under torture, but in reality, they are much the
same. The man or woman who can't "cope" with the pressures of life,
marital, social, financial, or job-related—and turns to an artificial
release such as drinking, is running from the problem, breaking, and
escaping into an illusion.
I found many insights and parallels to my own situation in Every Secret Thing, Patty Hearst's story of her kidnapping and ordeal with
the small revolutionary group known as the Symbionese Liberation Army.133
To some degree, all of us have been in Patty's position. There is a
lot to learn from her story.
Through no choice of her own, Patty was kidnapped, abused,
and forced to follow the SLA in 1974. She lived under an ever-present
threat of death. Patty decided that in order to survive, to stay
alive, she would say and do whatever her captors demanded.
Patty recalls a turning point in her captivity that occurred during a
thirty-day confinement in a small closet. She came to the point of
having to decide whether to live or die.
Under all that stress, my body was surrendering its life force, giving
up. I was so tired, so tired; all I wanted to do was to sleep; and I
knew that was dangerous, fatal, like the man lost in the Arctic snow,
who, having laid his head dow for that delicious nap, never woke up
again. My mind, suddenly, was alive and alert to all this. I could see
what was happening to me, as if I were outside myself.
A silent battle was waged there in the closet, and my mind won.
Deliberately and clearly, I decided I would not die of my own accord.
I would fight with everything in my power to survive; to see this
through. I would concentrate on staying alive one day at a time.134
Patty's one goal, was to stay alive at any cost. The SLA began to
confront her continually with the option "Fight or Die!"
I thought about it all the time. It seemed like a hideous offer... Day
after day I worried that I would be asked to make a choice, and I did
not know what I would say. I did not know what to believe.135
As Patty groped her way down this trail of survival, agreeing with
everything they wanted, an interesting phenomenon occurred. She says,
"They accepted me. I knew them and thought I understood them; even
their foolish quest as revolutionaries to overthrow the entire United
States. In trying to convince them, I convinced myself."136
As she yielded her will to theirs, consciously agreeing and accepting,
she opened herself to the effects of brainwashing and mind control.
What happened to her parallels exactly the pattern of the voluntary
suspension of disbelief. To stay alive, Patty came to accept as
reality what she knew to be false.
I experienced the same thing in my life, even though my circumstances
were different in detail.
The fear of death triggered in Patty Hearst's mind a well-defined
course of action, to which she responded. She would do anything to
stay alive. However, throughout her captivity and involvement with the
SLA, the underlying fears, resentment, and ambiguities gnawed at her
conscience and never gave her peace. She was a woman convinced against
her will. She was forced to live with a violated conscience. I
experienced this same condition in the COG. Beneath all the thoughts
lies a tormenting confusion that does not allow for peace or
happiness.
Patty did what was necessary to accomplish her goal of staying alive.
In regard to the famous bank robbery in which she was forced to take
part, she says,
I wanted the SLA to believe in me completely; and to that end I told
myself I would accept whatever they told me, and do whatever I had to
do to survive. In any event, I had my assignment. I would go into the
bank with the others.137
But the decision was taking its toll on Patty's conscious and sub-
conscious. Reality became distorted. She writes, "I never ceased to be
surprised when he [Donald DeFreeze, the top leader] accosted me with
that question 'Who are you?' and I would retort smartly, 'I'm a
soldier in the Symbionese Liberation Army.' I learned by rote, as
soldiers do in every army, and, despite myself, I found that I would
obey."138
As Patty's ordeal of physical captivity continued, she eventually
became a prisoner to her fears. I can understand exactly this mental
polarity, this conflict of conscience, the melting of right and wrong
into an amorphous mess. It is like mixing sugar and salt. To look at
it, no one can tell the difference, yet to taste it causes the palate
to explode in contradiction. The physical response to the taste is
nausea and vomiting. A similar response takes place morally and
psychologically in a situation like Patty's.
¯ ¯
When I returned to my father and his movement after running away in
London, I felt as if my mind had been split with an ax. On the one
hand, I knew how diseased Dad was morally; on the other, I wanted to serve God. There was no peace—only confusion
and a spiritual and psychological nausea. To try to live in perversion
and for the glory of God at the same time was insanity.
Fear is a powerful, though vile, motivation. Where conscience is
involved, fear creates a moral polarity that tears the soul apart. One
lives continually with the question, "What is more acceptable, to
bypass one's conscience because of fear, and knowingly do what is
wrong, or to yield to the demands of conscience and do what it tells
you is right regardless of the consequences?"
I will not judge Patty Hearst; that is not my place, but God's; yet I
was faced with the very same kind of choice that she was when I was
face to face with my father. So many times I was faced with the choice
of living for the Cause of David Berg, or resisting him at risk of
suffering. I failed. Repeatedly I buckled under to fear. I repressed
my guilt, violated my conscience, and did things I knew were immoral
and wrong, justifying them through religious reasoning, through the
"good works" we were doing.
I judge myself now on the basis of truths I learned the hard way—through failure, agony, and seeing the consequences of my sin in the
lives of my children and others whom I love. I think about Patty
Hearst and wonder, "What if she had resisted her captors?" According
to the conditions of her captivity and the fanatical zeal of the SLA,
she would have been shot. What would have happened had I withstood my
father? Only God knows. My brother fought the same spiritual battle I
did. He could not follow Dad with a clear conscience, yet he would not
face him and call him wrong. The confusion overwhelmed him, so he
ended it all. I too lived with a haunting desire for suicide.
Until I left the Children of God, I never withstood my father, and no
one else in my family has. Why? Because of fear. It is not for fear of
physical harm, for as I have said, my dad has never exhibited a
violent nature. He was a loving and gentle father as I was growing up.
Rather, his power comes from intimidating people through a subtle
blend of sin and pride, using their own guilty conscience as a lever
against them.
One can become free of my father only through conquering the fear of
accepting mistakes and facing one's sin. Conquer this fear, and David
Berg loses the power to intimidate. But it is perhaps the greatest of all fears. To expose my dad was to expose myself;
so for a long time I decided instead to follow him and sin after him.
¯ ¯
I see that people in a situation like Patty Hearst's, or like mine,
have a great need. That need is for strength of character founded on
godly principles. The sixties were an era of great rebellion; but
rebellion does not build character. Rebellion is the result of a soul
suffering the burden of sin and guilt. And immorality does not build
character. Greed and the love of money do not build character. The
power that will destroy cults and destructive groups such as the SLA
is the strength of character grounded in the power and authority of
scriptural principles.
Great men of God in history have not been ruled by fear. Neither fear
of death, nor of torture, nor failure, nor social rejection. Rather,
they have been governed by divine standards. These standards keep us
strong, free from mental polarity, and free from the torment of soul
wrought by a fear of conscience.
In contrast to Patty Hearst's decision, consider the ordeal of Richard
Wurmbrand. He was face to face with unmitigated evil and abuse for
fourteen years, yet he did not break. He did not bend to the will of
his captors. He is a living example of his own statement that
persecution and suffering reveal strength of personal character or the
lack of it.
Many Christians have asked Wurmbrand, "Which Scriptures helped you
endure your torture?" His response is intriguing.
"Christians," Wurmbrand wrote, "were tied to crosses for three days
and three nights. The crosses were laid on the floor at different
times of the day, and the other prisoners were tortured in such a way
as to force them to relieve their bodily necessities on the faces of
these men. Then the crosses were erected again.
"One does not hang upon a cross," he said."Your body cries out in
agony at the torment of the pain, so you twist and turn to find a more
comfortable position, only to find that the new one is more painful
than the last. You do not hang upon a cross, you writhe in endless
agony.
"In such conditions we knew the verse. 'My grace is sufficient for
thee', but the verse 'My grace is sufficient' was not sufficient. We
also knew the Twenty-third Psalm, 'The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall
not want', but the psalm about the Shepherd did not help us. A verse
about grace was not sufficient; we needed grace. A psalm about the
Shepherd was not sufficient; we needed the Shepherd Himself. No verse
on earth could enable us to endure such torture."
The Communists also put Wurmbrand's wife in prison, and his only son
was left to himself, without mother or father to care for him, at the
age of ten. When the interrogators were not torturing Richard
Wurmbrand, then his mind and heart were torturing him as to what had
become of his family. Only the person of Jesus Christ, he explains,
can sustain a person in such circumstances.
"In the West," Wurmbrand writes, "I see a danger of Christians
worshipping the Bible." He makes a statement that puzzled me at first;
but when I considered it in light of the confusion and suffering I had
experienced because of the Children of God, its meaning became clear.
"The Bible is not 'the Truth,'" Wurmbrand writes."God is 'the Truth.'
The Bible is 'the truth about the Truth.' Theology, if it is the right
theology, is 'the truth about the truth about the Truth'; and a good
sermon is 'the truth about the truth about the truth about the Truth';
and Christian people live in these many truths about the Truth, and,
because of them, have not 'the Truth.'"139
Wurmbrand further explains that people must strip away the scaffolding
of words that surrounds "the Truth." We must penetrate through
everything that is "words" and be bound up with the reality of God
Himself. This is the secret that enabled him to endure fourteen years
of suffering under the Communists.
Under constant threat of death, innumerable tortures, near-
starvation, and bitter cold, Wurmbrand would not recant his faith in
Christ, betray his fellow Christians, (even though he was sent to
prison as a result of another's betrayal), or swear allegiance to his
captors' regime. Miraculously, he survived. His wife also survived six
years in prison; and their son lived to see them both freed.
There are countless thousands of Christians who have not
escaped death—the martyrs of the Underground Church. But more
miraculous than the fact of Richard Wurmbrand's survival, is the power
that enabled him to resist the fear of death.
Because his life was founded on divine principles, because he was
bound up with the Reality of God, he was motivated by love and not by
hate. The power of his resistance was love. He professed as much love
for his tormentors as for his brothers in Christ. The power of the
love of God enabled him with strength and clarity of mind to live in
forgiveness instead of becoming a twisted, embittered, foul, and
hateful man.
Unlike me, Wurmbrand did not choose to stay alive "at any cost." He
conquered his fear. He was not intimidated by it or ruled by evil as a
consequence. He was in prison, but not a prisoner. Fear is the real
prison. Ironically, Wurmbrand found eternal freedom in the cold, dark
prison cells of Rumania.
Great men are ruled by divine principles. This is what we must teach
our children. This is the one true power against cults or any outside
forces that would dominate us. And more than that, through Christ it
is the power over evil itself.
¯ ¯
We see a tree, yet we cannot touch its beauty with our hearts because
our hearts are bound with fear and sin. We see our children, yet our
emotions are not at liberty to open the floodgates of love with which
we would engulf them. We see, but we cannot touch. We feel, yet our
hearts are bound. How many live in prison? In varying degrees, we are
all in the prisons of our sinful selves, of wrong and limited ideas;
but Jesus can free us of these.
We must teach our children by our own example to understand, believe
in, and live by divine standards revealed to us in Scripture;
otherwise, they will not have sufficient strength of character to
recognize and resist evil. Ultimately, fear will rule their hearts,
and consequently rule the world.
As I scan the panorama of my past, it is hard to see anything but the
mountains of failures and mistakes; but God has set before me a new
pathway. God has put to me the question, "Despite your past failures,
can you purpose in your heart never again to be ruled by fear?" I have
accepted that challenge.
|
|
|
Responses
to this article:
6
Last response dated:
Dec 3, 2004
read/post
responses
[ homepage ]
|